Use the evaluation rubric below to determine what is expected of you at the end of this project. Your teacher will score you on how well you know your subject material, the quality of your group's presentation, and the quality of your work ethic.
Study tip: print off this page and keep it in your binder; after completing each step in the 'process' part of the webquest, evaluate your work and the work of your group, and see how you'll do when you've finished the project.
| Excellent (5) | Above Average (4) | Good (3) | Acceptable (2) | Incomplete (1) | |
Mastery of Content Area (Individual Student) |
|||||
| Can describe salmon's life cycle in detail | |||||
| Knowledge of risks to Kokanee's survival | |||||
| Using student's research, a clear case as to why dropping Kokanee populations are occurring can be made | |||||
| Students can explain the connection between salmon and watershed health | |||||
| Work Ethic (Individual Student) | |||||
| Effective in group role | |||||
| Encouraging and supportive of others | |||||
| Respectful of others | |||||
| Participated in all appropriate activities | |||||
| Organized and completed project components on-time | |||||
| Quality of Presentation (group mark) | |||||
| Appropriate use of visual aids | |||||
| Speakers were clear and to-the-point | |||||
| Good use of design skills evident in the visual aids | |||||
| All "tech" stuff was tested and ready to go (we didn't wait for someone to try and make a projector work…) | |||||
| Written Work (group mark) | |||||
| All written communications are clear and effective | |||||
| Correct spelling and grammar in all written communications | |||||
|
|